ROUND 1 September 27, 2015
ROUND 1 GAMES
ROUND 6 FEB. 14, 2016
ROUND 6 GAMES
PHALANX DORATA VS. PITT II
LAWRENCE P. JONES VS. JORDAN LACKNER
[Event "PCL Division II"]
[Site "Board 2 Phalanx Dorata vs Pitt II"]
[Date "February 14, 2016"]
[White "Jones, Lawrence P"]
[Black "Lackner, Jordan"]
[Result "draw"]
[PlyCount "93"]
[Event "PCL Division II"] [Site "Board 2 Phalanx Dorata vs Pitt II"] [Date "February 14, 2016"] [White "Jones, Lawrence P"] [Black "Lackner, Jordan"] [Result "draw"] [PlyCount "93"] 1.d4 Nf6 2.Bf4 d5 3.Nd2 Bf5 4.e3 e6 5.Bd3 Bxd3 6.cxd3 Nbd7 7.Ngf3 Be7 8.Rc1 c6 9.h3 Rc8 10. O-O O-O 11.Nb3 Qb6 12.Ne5 Rfd8 13.Ng4 (13.Bg5 Re8 {0.00}) 13…a5 (13…Nxg4 14.Qxg4 Qa6 {-0.48}) 14.Nxf6+ Bxf6 15.Nc5 Nxc5 16.dxc5 Qa7 17.d4 b6 18.Bd6 bxc5 (18…b5 19.a4 b4 {+0.07}) 19.Bxc5 Qb7 20.b3 Be7? {+0.98}(20…Ra8 21.Qc2 Qd7 {0.25}) 21.Qd2 Bxc5 22.Rxc5 Qb4 23.Qc2 (23.Rd1 Ra8 24.Rxc6{+0.92}) 23…Rd6?? (23…a4 24.bxa4 Ra8 {+0.51}) 24.Rc1 g6 25.Qc3 Kf8 (25…Ra8 26.Rxc6 Rxc6 {+1.37}) 26.Rxa5 Qxc3 27.Rxc3 Ke7 28.Rac5 Kd7 29.f4 h5 (29…Ra8 30.a4 Ra6 {+1.28}) 30.a3 f6 31.b4 Rb8 32.Ra5 Rb7? {+2.51}(32…Kc7 33.Kf2 Rb6 {+1.55}) 33.Ra8 e5 34.Rg8 exd4 35.exd4 f5 36.Re3 Kc7 37.Rg7+ Kb6 38.Rxb7+ Kxb7 39.Kf2 Rd7?? {+3.61}(39…Kb6 40.a4 Rd8{+2.05}) 40.Kg3 Kb6 41.a4? Ra7 42.Ra3 Re7 43.Kf3?? {+0.25}(43.a5+ Kb5 44.Rc3 {+2.15}) Re4 44.Rd3 h4 45.g3 {+0.00}(45.Rd1 Kb7 46.g3 {+0.34}) hxg3 46.Kxg3 Kc7 47.Kf3 {0.00} [draw offer]
Draw Agreed
Larry Jones of Phalanx Dorata needed a draw to draw the match and keep his team at the top of the 5th-8th ranked teams in Division II. A win for either side won the match. Larry played the London system and gained a winning position, but ended up in a drawn rook and pawn ending and offered a draw. I included the computer evaluations in {brackets} and the best line in (parentheses) after the mistakes. After move 39, the evaluation was +3.61, which was the biggest lead of the game.
No comments:
Post a Comment